All posts by James W. Breckenridge

Rude Awakening.

A snarling, growling police dog lunging at your face in an apparent desire to rip it off, has to rank high on the list of really bad wakeup calls.

One supposes it is easier to intimidate the homeless when you wake them out of a peaceful sleep in the night to find a police dog straining to attack them. Their focus tends to be on the leash that is all that is keeping them from being mauled.

In case the threat of their trained attack dog is not enough to drive the homeless to find a new camping ground somewhere else, the police threatened to unleash a beast that strikes fear into any citizen who has the misfortune to become its prey – the bylaw enforcement officers.

Yes, the police told their sleep-befuddled victim that if the camp was not abandoned they would set the bylaw officers loose and all the victim’s meagre possessions would garbaged – leaving the victim helplessly exposed to the life-threatening wet and cold elements of the weather. This police statement would appear to confirm the reports made of bylaw officers looting and destroying homeless person’s possessions all over the city.

What heinous crime have these homeless people committed? Existence – worse: the audacity to exist and camp in Abbotsford and camp.

Some kids out exploring/playing/ looking for ???, had come across the camp and been “freaked out” at finding a homeless person existed in their neighbourhood. The Parents phoned the police to run off the homeless – presumably uncaring where the homeless go as long as it’s NIMBY.

Sorry, but I have to inform that this behaviour will not work. Because in some other neighbourhood some other citizen is having the police harass the homeless out of THEIR backyard. Consequently even as a homeless person is displaced from one neighbourhood, another homeless person displaced from some other neighbourhood is moving into the abandoned camp.

The pointlessness of continually wasting taxpayer’s hard-earned money to chase the homeless in endless circles around Abbotsford is not, as important point as it is, the major point we as a city, as a society, should be troubled by. Neither is the ethical questions raised by using trained police dogs to hunt down, find the camps and harass the homeless in the middle of the night.

No what I want the reader to think about is the lessons we are teaching our kids by this behaviour and the effect these lessons will have on them and the society they will make. Consider as well what this behaviour says about us and the society the kids will inherit from us.

Kindness, compassion, help, love? NO, not in this neighbourhood. People are continually complaining about the behaviour of kids today. Think about where and who they learned these decried behaviours from.

How are we teaching them to address problems and issues? Denial, pretend it does not exist or drive it into someone else’s backyard and hope they solve it. This behaviour teaches them nothing about taking responsibility, facing problems full on and thoughtfully dealing with them.

People make fun of and laugh about suits brought by children against their parents for the way they were raised. I am beginning to think that kids today have a legitimate right to sue their parents for failing to raise them in a manner that equipped them to deal with the problems and challenges they will inherit; part of the first generation of children that will inherit a world of less opportunity, lesser dreams, squandered resources and a failing ecology from their parents.

A Big Hand – for council’s approval of Spirit Bear proposal!

I had the distinct pleasure of watching council give approval to the Spirit Bear Centre Society proposal for a detox/recovery facility for female youth.

Personal experience has taught me that detox/treatment/recovery for youth is non-existent in this area. In truth, services for youth are virtually non-existent in this province.

Councillor Lowen was accurate about the quality of the people involved when he spoke in support of the proposal . Councilor Smith was correct when he said that we are deceiving ourselves if we do not think we have youth in our community who need this type of mentoring and recovery. He was also right that there is a need for a variety of facilities to address our communities addiction, recovery and homeless issues.

Councilor Smith was also quite correct in his statement that we want to attract and support responsible groups that are going to provide services that benefit our community. It is by welcoming and supporting people such as those at Spirit Bear that we ensure that our detox/recovery facilities are world class. As a city we have have seen what happens when you do not support good facilities and organizations.

It was positive to hear that Councillor Ross took the time to meet and inspect the premises. On the other hand it was unfortunate to hear Councillor Gill give in to the NIMBYs.

The citizens of the neighbourhood should not feel as though they have been singled out. The harsh, sad reality is that with the number of issues and thus facilities needed to address and reduce Abbotsfords social problems, all neighbourhoods in the city will be host to facilities. Reality is that the need for recovery and transition facilities in this city is deep and we want not only to put in place the structures needed, but to attract the best people and societies to be running these programs.

Bravo for council for approving this proposal and setting a precedent for approving projects filling community needs and involving good people. I would ask that council direct city staff to extend a welcome to Spirit Bear and to facilitate any needs they may have. I would also ask citizens who have the opportunity to both say “Well done” to council and lend support to Spirit Bear.

I do have a question/challenge for those who signed the petition against this proposal, a paraphrasing of John F. Kennedy. Ask not what your community can do for you, but what you can do for you community. What are you going to do to make this facility a success? They say it takes a community to raise a child. It definitely takes a community to reclaim a child or person from drugs.

This question/challenge is important not only for those of the neighbourhood, but as a question/challenge for all citizens. For in the answer lies the truth of whether Abbotsford is merely a collection of buildings? Or is Abbotsford a Community?

Senate reform 101

Senate reform seems to sink into a quagmire of complexity and political self interest. Is it not rational to change our frame of reference on the question of Senate reform?

Canadian citizens footing the cost of the senate need to get value for their money.

Canadian citizens need to derive benefit from the monies spent on the Senate, but Senate changes become lost in arguments about the form change should take. What we need is a change that requires no amendments to any legislation governing the Senate, but results in a Senate/Senators benefiting Canada.

Simple. We change who is to be appointed to the Senate, not the how, directing the Prime Minister to appoint Senators from a pool meeting the requirements the Canadian people feel will benefit the country.

I would like to propose that we use the Senate to support advocates, agents of change …. Use whatever label you choose for those who champion causes such as homelessness, poverty, climate change, child care etc.

As a country we face the need to address many social, economic fairness and environmental issues. Issues that we need to have a public debate on in order that we can formulate effective and cost efficient policies to address these issues.

Unfortunately we currently have no such debate taking place in this country. Currently we have politicians and their followers throwing around trite sound bites based on their ideology or what they think the public wants to hear – or both. Despite all the rhetoric, claims and promises these problems continue to grow and worsen.

These are complex issues containing far more gray than black or white, without nice neat solutions, often requiring multiple approaches to effect change. In other words – messy. The reality being that dealing with them will result in mistakes, some negative outcomes and someone, somewhere screaming out their upset. The type of issues that have politicians running for cover – or using trite phrases and telling the public what it wants to hear.

So we take those with a passion to address these issues, some brains, good communications skills, an ability to find compromise and consensus and other traits we think would be helpful and we appoint them to the senate.

Being a senator grants them financial security and independence, affording an opportunity to focus on the issues. It provides for travel, opens doors and provides a public platform to engage and address the Canadian public, a voice an ordinary citizen does not have. It provides an interesting and challenging group of peers to brainstorm with.

These senators can lead the public debate, generating ideas and feedback, building consensus on what course our country should pursue. This provides protection for the politicians while it ensures that the debates and policy decisions we need as a country take place.

By reforming the Senate in this way we create a Canadian institution that is focused on creating positive change, becoming a world leader in how to achieve change and growth

Abbotsford News distainful of low income earners

I do not know Mr. Grant Granger so I cannot say if his words in “Casino’s will strike you Out” in the Saturday December 15th Abbotsford News are a result of prejudice, ignorance or a parochial mind set.

All I can definitely state is that I and other low income people I have spoken with about his scurrilous aspersions, find his words demeaning, defamatory and highly offensive.

As low income earners we do not have the money to waste on gambling. As responsible citizens we need all our funds to pay our bills.

Despite Mr. Granger’s assertion that we are brain dead to the point we “…mechanically put their money down the drain (i.e. slots)…” we have far too many better things to do and accomplish, than to waste precious time and money in this manner. We also understand mathematics, more than well enough to appreciate the statistical futility of counting on chance to solve our tight financial situations.

Mr. Granger would appear to be the one lacking in a grasp of basic mathematics. A simple application of mathematics makes clear that there is not enough cash in the hands of low income earners to generate the cash flow and profits casinos and gambling in general enjoy. A look in the mirror would reveal to Mr. Granger the economic class who are the bread and butter of the gambling industry.

Most condescending is the implicit assumption that the richness, enjoyment and value of a life are a function of income. While it is true a more substantial cash flow would make life easier, it would not, in and of itself, increase my joie de vie. His words would suggest that Mr. Granger is in serious need of re-evaluating his values and seeking a better spiritual understanding of what is of value in life.

Mr. Granger needs to stop displaying his contemptuousness for those with low incomes, insulting our intelligence and the value of our lives. He and his like especially need to stop the disrespectful behaviour of deceptively trotting out low income earners, crying counterfeit tears over us, in order to further their anti-gambling agenda.

If you are truly concerned for and about low income earners stop, worrying about YOUR agenda and start worrying about and addressing THEIR NEEDS.

Postscript: the newspapers that printed this piece of slanderous injustice owe an apology to all low income earners for disseminating this insulting claptrap.