All posts by James W. Breckenridge

Trump Sets Out Canada’s Path To Winning Trump’s Tariff War

Being Canadian and a creatively maladjusted polymath, watching the Bulwark podcast containing the video of Donald Trump1 repeating Russian talking points about the Ukraine War and then proceeding to blame Ukraine – the country that was invaded – for the war, Trump’s words revealed the path for Canada to prosper in dealing with Donald Trump and the Trump Tariffs.

Following the path set out by Donald Trump in his solution to the Ukrainian War, would see Canada reap significant economic benefits by ignoring imaginary lines on a map and invading the USA thereby acquiring territory and economies currently claimed by the USA.

Under the Trump Doctrine [the course of action and rationalization set out by Donald Trump with respect to the Ukraine War and ending the Ukraine War] the United State would be responsible for starting the war because of the threat posed by US tariffs.

In addition, the Trump Doctrine would require the USA, in order to end the invasion/war, cede the states of California, Oregon, Washington and New York to Canada.

The addition of the states of California, Oregon, Washington and New York as new Canadian provinces would resolve the Tariff War since the addition of the state’s economies to the Canadian economy would render the threat of American tariffs moot.

In addition to the super charged boost to the Canadian economy from adding California, Oregon, Washington and New York to Canada as provinces, the territorial additions would enable Canadians to get their winter sunny, warm weather fix without a need to leave Canada.

Canada should include Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine among the territories demanded to end the invasion in order to provide states for the [self proclaimed] master negotiator Donald Trump to ‘save’ through ‘negotiation’.

I acknowledge the unfairness – the discourtesy – of raising the hopes of the states and  residents of  Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine when those states are included solely for the purpose of salving the delicate ego of Donald Trump.

Should Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine wish to join California, Oregon. Washington and New York in becoming Canadian provinces it is probable Canadians would be amenable to accommodating those states.

Should this occur Canada would need to add ‘red states’ to Canada’s territorial demands which would grant Donald Trump the additional benefit of not simply ‘saving’ states, but ‘saving’ states that voted for Donald Trump.

While this may sound ridiculous – Canada invading the USA in response to tariffs; the USA being responsible for forcing Canada to invade because of the US threats and tariffs; the US surrendering the states of California, Oregon. Washington and New York to Canada to end Canada’s invasion – it is the way the world works according to the Trump Doctrine set out by Donald Trump.

1 the honorific ‘President” is not attached to Donald Trump out of respect for John Adams, Abraham Lincoln, FDR and John F. Kennedy.

‘Eight Year Health Crisis’? – BULLSH*T!

No matter how often a mantra of rationalization is repeated, or how many use that mantra of rationalization, rationalization does not change the facts or the Reality defined by those facts.

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence”.  John Adams

The facts and evidence are indisputably clear: British Columbians do not continue to die at a rate of six a day as a result of an 8 year ‘health crisis.

Crisis: a stage in a sequence of events at which the trend of all future events,  especially for better or for worse, is determined.  [dictionary.com]

Yes, a health crisis occurred when the toxicity of the illicit drug supply reached a level where the drugs were poisonous and people were dying as a consequence of that toxicity.

However, even if one refuses to recognize that by definition a crisis does not last eight years, once the coroner examined the bodies, determined the cause of death and reported to government, politicians and the public the cause and course of action required to stop British Columbians dying from the poisonous toxicity of the illicit drug supply it ceased to be a health crisis and became a crisis of character and ethics.

The government, politicians and the public chose not to take the action set out by the coroner and in doing so chose to allow people to continue to die from the poisonous toxicity of the illicit drug supply in BC.

Thus BC citizens have been dying for the past eight years, not from a non-existent health crisis but because the government has not acted to implement the determinations of the BC coroner service.

No amount of denial or rationalization will change the fact that people are dying as a result of the choice by the public, politicians and government not take the actions necessary to stop the dying.

The reality is that these deaths are preventable. Toxicology data confirms that the drug supply in British Columbia is increasingly volatile and life-threatening.”  Chief coroner Lisa Lapointe

Although I suppose that one could argue that it is a crisis of vincible ignorance, ignorance arising from the choice not to know.

Thus the public, politicians and government do not want to take the actions required and/or do not take the actions required because what the public, politicians and government ‘know for sure’ about addiction and substance use/abuse is wrong and this ignorance exists because they choose not to know.

Choosing to remain ignorant allows the public, politicians and government to cling to what they ‘know for sure’ about addiction and substance abuse [no matter how incorrect]  by avoiding the need for the facts and analysis of critical thinking, changing their minds and actions.

In the end, because remaining ignorant is a choice, vincible ignorance is also a matter of character and ethics.

The public, politicians and government are responsible for the consequences of their chosen ignorance and therefore are responsible for the deaths that have resulted from drug toxicity since the point in time the BC coroner’s report set out cause of death and how to prevent more deaths.

Culpability exacerbated every month as the public, politicians and government ignore the monthly BC Coroner’s report on the deaths and how to stop the deaths; choosing to cling to their mantra of justification and denying responsibility for the deaths caused by choosing to do nothing to stop people dying.

There are lots of pious words, but any actions taken do nothing to stop people dying.

The facts evidence that the public, politicians and government judge the lives of those dying from using illicit drugs – of addiction – as not worth the discomfort and effort required to stop the dying.

A Reality, however ugly it may be, that no amount of rationalization, denial of responsibility or self absolution will change.

It is time to cry BULLSH*T and witness the responsibility of the public, politicians and government for the continuing deaths from the toxic deadliness of BC’s illicit drug supply because of the choice by the public, politicians and government to do nothing and allow the deaths to continue.

To say you have no choice is to release yourself from responsibility and that’s not how a person with integrity acts.

Patrick Ness

Whatever you do, it’s a decision and you have to accept responsibility for it. That’s when honour becomes more than empty words.”

Lynn Flewelling

Re: Canada’s first in-hospital overdose prevention site touts lives saved in first year

The headline regarding St. Paul’s Hospital’s overdose prevention site was accurate [free from error or defect; precise; exact. b) careful or meticulous.] when it used touts [to describe or advertise boastfully; publicize or promote;].

I lack sufficient information, and/or access to information to determine the facts regarding the claim “first overdose prevention site inside a Canadian acute-care hospital’; in particular the exact definition of what constitutes or differentiates an ‘acute-care hospital.

Experience, evidence and facts provide indisputable evidence as to the inaccuracy of the claim ‘has so far saved dozens of lives”; at least for anyone who applies critical and reflective thinking.

Continue reading Re: Canada’s first in-hospital overdose prevention site touts lives saved in first year