Category Archives: Municipal

LEADERSHIP.

I found myself mulling over leadership after listening to pundits holding forth on the issue of leadership during the current Federal election, reflecting on the scene in BC and with reference to Abbotsford’s municipal election in November.

The conclusion I reached was that it has been so long since Canadians and people around the world have had any real leadership in the public and political arenas that Canadians and others no longer know or understand what leadership is and so they accept the pale imitation passed off as leadership today.

In considering Mr. Harper’s “leadership advantage” it became clear that people have erroneously come to falsely mistake management for leadership.

“Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things.” Peter Drucker

Calling this election as Mr. Harper did was a management decision based on perceived political opportunity and advantage. The right thing to have done, the right message to send and example to set was to not to give into temptation but to obey they law Mr. Harpers government had passed as necessary to prevent political opportunism by federal parties – the opportunism he gave into.

Mr. Harper made a strategic decision rather than a decision based on character ignoring the wisdom shared by General H. Norman Schwarzkopf that “Leadership is a combination of strategy and character. If you must be without one, be without the strategy.”

Mr. Harper may well run a tight ship, ruling with an iron fist but as Dwight D. Eisenhower noted “You do not lead by hitting people over the head-that’s assault, not leadership.”

Arnold Glasgow: “One of the tests of leadership is the ability to recognize a problem before it becomes an emergency.” One of the ways you do this is by facing the music, even if you don’t want to hear the tune.

Not only has Mr. Harper refused to acknowledge problems that interfere with his plans or that he doesn’t want to talk about – demonstrated by his recent behaviour of repeatedly stating the Canadian economy was fine in the face of evidence to the contrary; Mr. Harper fails to acknowledge or act on issues such as the major social problems facing Canadians and our cities (homelessness, poverty, affordable housing) that do not fit into his world view.

“A real leader faces the music, even when he doesn’t like the tune.” Anon

Of course with reference to major social problems such as homelessness, poverty and affordable housing Mr. Harper is not alone in his refusal to see or address a problem while it is more manageable in size rather than allowing it to grow into a large problem or a crisis. Provincial governments/politicians as well as municipal governments/politicians also chose to turn a blind eye to these issues, pointing their fingers at others as being responsible for addressing the issues and when they grew into an epidemic – they run around the proverbial “chickens without heads”.

They bury their heads in the sand to avoid seeing or hearing what they do not want to see or hear while Canadians long for the “good old days” as society becomes less civil and more dog-eat-dog.

“The very essence of leadership is that you have to have vision.” Theodore Hesburgh.

Why is vision so important? Because if we want a civil, supportive and healthy society we all need to be better than we are.

We have to do the little things and the big things – the things we would rather not do or have to do. For example: Carry your litter until you find a garbage can to put it in; Saying please and thank you or being patient in line-ups; Donating to the food bank – even when worried for ourselves; Taking a deep breath and behaving in a rational manner – even when our emotions are running high; Remembering that children are the future, that we need to raise healthy children and that it takes a community to raise a child and that as a community we need to invest and provide the resources needed to raise healthy children; Look at the long term as well, instead of focusing on the short term – yes “going green” will cause some economic pain but not making those changes will, in the longer run, cause economic disaster;

It is this need bring out the best that led Blaine Lee to state “The great leaders are like the best conductors – they reach beyond the notes to reach the magic in the players.”

To do that you need vision not dogma as reaching for the magic in the players requires inspiring the player to want to strive for the vision. Reaching out to inspire also serves to remind a leader that decisions made have an effect on the players in the real world and you have to consider, to understand, that those decisions will have effects in the real world.

“Leadership should be born out of the understanding of the needs of those who would be affected by it.” – Marian Anderson

I do not know if it is ideology or that he just does not get it, but Mr. Harper’s actions and words show a total lack of understanding of the costs and challenges of issues such as child care for most Canadians. Mr. Harper stated that the other parties’ plans to replace the nominal $100 per month Conservative policy with a real investment in childcare were a bad idea because parents would lose the $100 a month. Ordinary Canadians struggling with child care need real help, not a token $100 a month. Of course for the wealthy the $100 was a nice bonus, a further transfer of wealth to the wealthy from the poor.

The flagrant lack of understanding demonstrated by Mr. Harper on this manner is the effect this $100 a month could have on those who were not wealthy or well off. i.e. those families where the extra $1200 put them over the income limit at the food bank and disqualified them from using the food bank. For these people the $100 a month was a devastating blow to their survival – forget about child care. Making up for not being able to access the food bank cost more out of pocket than they received, making the child care payment a cost not a gain.

Don’t they ever think? What world are they living in? Hey – pay attention to the effect of your actions in the real world. You’re supposed to represent all Canadians not just the wealthy and corporations.

Federal, provincial, municipal politicians – I can not count the times I have made those statements or heard them from others.

“Becoming a leader is synonymous with becoming yourself. It is precisely that simple, and it is also that difficult.” – Warren Bennis

I end with this quote because life has, over the past few years, taught me just how important it is to grow and to continue to grow as a person; just how difficult and uncomfortable that can be; how rewarding making the effort and working through the discomfort is.

I am comfortable in my own skin now and like the person I have become and am becoming. I will not be having spin doctors dressing me up in warm fuzzy sweaters or staging “meetings” with families, not simply because becoming who I am has granted me empathy and understanding, but because such falsehoods would not be being true to ME.

In becoming yourself you learn the importance of not taking yourself to seriously, of being able to laugh at yourself; that life is something to be lived and enjoyed and far to important to be taken only seriously.

Give Thanks by sharing.

Thanksgiving: the act of giving thanks; grateful acknowledgment of benefits or favours.

Thanksgiving came to us from England where it was called the Harvest Festival.

Harvest is from the Anglo-Saxon word hærfest, “Autumn”. It then came to refer to the season for reaping and gathering grain and other grown products.

Harvest Festival used to be celebrated at the beginning of the Harvest season on 1 August although nowadays the festival is held at the end of harvest. Farmers celebrated the end of the harvest with a big meal called a harvest supper.

This is where our tradition of Thanksgiving Dinner comes from.

In Britain people bring in food and the food is often distributed among the poor and senior citizens of the local community.

What better act to give thanks for one’s good fortune, benefits and favours than to share food with those members of the community who are not so favoured or fortunate?

Please, as you gather the items and ingredients for your Harvest Supper, remember the Abbotsford Bank – gathering a few items to share with those in need in our community.

If you cannot publish this letter by me due to the election, please remind your readers in whatever manner you choose to remember those who have less or little to be thankful for.

True generosity?

True generosity?

“A bone to the dog is not charity. Charity is the bone shared with the dog, when you are just as hungry as the dog.” Jack London


Watching the news reports about the desperate state of need for donations at local food banks left me considering the true essence of generosity and charity.

There are studies that have shown that the people with little or nothing to spare can be the most generous. Not in the amount given, since obviously the $$$ are just not there, but in the relationship between what they keep for themselves and what they give. When things are tough and there is little to spare this group continues to give – often because they have worn the shoes of people who depend on places such as the food banks for enough to eat to live.

On $1 meal days I have watched those who did not have a dollar the meal day before and who may not have a dollar on the next meal day, but had a spare dollar this meal day, buy someone else a meal. I have had to ponder my own generosity after watching someone spend their $1 on someone they thought really needed the meal – even though it meant they had to eat a bowl of free soup.

Yes the future is uncertain, but rather than being less generous we need to be more generous to essential services such as the food bank – because the demand for help to put food in stomachs increases during economic down turns.

Jack London is right, true generosity is sharing even when times may be tight or tough for you.

Ask handyDART Users.

Ask handyDART Users.

I was at an Abbotsford-Mission Transit Committee meeting in support of a presentation being made to the committee about difficulties that had been encountered with handyDART service.


Time will tell how that matter plays itself out, but two items, one I didn’t hear and one I did hear, came to my attention at the meeting.

It was stated that the committee is working on its new five year plan for the transit system – including handy dart

What I didn’t/haven’t heard is that the committee has sought input from those who need and use handyDART service.

There are methods and techniques that have been developed for planning transit. However these are not applicable to handyDART as this service is by its nature much more of an individual transit system, as opposed to mass/public transportation system.

Given the individualized nature of handyDART service it would see both logical and sensible to seek out input on the current state of handyDART service and information about probable demands on handyDART service over that five year period.

I heard no comments from the committee to suggest they are seeking input from those with an personal vested interest in the handyDART system, nor have I heard anything about such input being sought from those I know who use or have clients that use/need handyDART services.

I believe it is necessary for the committee to seek input from those who use handyDART services prior to formulating a new five-year transit plan. Failure to seek such input before formulating the plan would result in a plan having no more validity than if they had used a Ouija board to formulate it.

Hearing feedback from patrons about problems and lack of access with handyDART service was of concern, but what was truly disturbing was the reason given for why patrons and caregivers did not want to step forward and complain – Retaliation.

There is something unconscionable about the thought that some of our most of vulnerable citizens, people who truly need our help to have a good quality of life, are afraid to assert their right to handyDART services out of FEAR.

It is a point that Abbotsford-Mission Transit Committee must explore and address.

Both these matters unheard and heard demonstrate why the Abbotsford-Mission Transit Committee needs to have representatives of users of both public and handyDART services as members on the committee, if they are to understand the needs of patrons in order to maximize the delivery of services.

handyDART

Monday morning found me nervous as my picture was taken for the newspaper and the announcement I would be seeking a seat on Abbotsford City Council. Running for a seat on council is not something I had ever thought to find myself doing and having made the decision to run I was feeling a little trepidation.


Right up until I heard Brian Herrmann relating what was going on with the handyDART system of disabled and handicapped bus service in Abbotsford.

As Mr. Herrmann notes: “Day Programs provide, in many cases, the only socialization, entertainment, and awareness of the community, that seniors and people with disabilities receive. Unable to attend these programs, means that they are sitting at home, with few options.”

I had heard about problems when applying for handyDART services for individuals who have special needs, that nobody new could get transportation. People were told that this would resolve itself when the entire system in the lower mainland was reorganized and that this would result in increased handyDART services in Abbotsford that would give access to Vancouver from Abbotsford.

However the Abbotsford-Mission Joint Transit Committee chose not to pursue this change. Unfortunately the Committee also chose not to make the changes necessary to meet the increased need/demand for handyDART transportation.

The result is people are being made prisoners in their homes because they cannot get the specialized transportation they need to get out into the community.

Possibly this explains why Abbotsford council felt that making even one playground accessible to the disabled was unnecessary. After all if you are not going to provide a way for the disabled to get out of their homes and into the community, it is unnecessary for you to provide somewhere such as an accessible playground for them to enjoy.

I have seen how much the ability to use handyDART and getting out into the community benefits those who need the service.

An accessible playground for the disabled and handyDART services sufficient to meet the needs of our community should be a priority.

Rather than councils priority in spending money putting Council’s Million Dollar$ Puddle in front of the Clearbrook Library.