Category Archives: Issues

Was Mr. Rushton, Was.

Success was a matter of hard work. Today hard work may well only permit you to keep your head barely above water. Today the difficulties in breaking out of poverty and those who find they cannot break out vastly outnumber the stories of someone who rose from rags to riches.

I speak from experience having had to start my life over due to mental illness.

The first time around hard work did lead to success. Of course salaries then allowed me not only to pay my living expenses but save enough to go to University and graduate without any debt. Articling and becoming a Chartered Accountant, moving into business all were made much easier because I had no debt, was young and there were simply more opportunities then.

Contrast that with today’s graduates who graduate owing tens of thousands of dollars they must repay. I could save money for school working 40 hours a week; throw in 20 hours of overtime and I could save enough in a year to attend University and do the four year course in three years because I had saved that much money in a year.

There are people working close to 60 hours a week in Abbotsford just to earn enough to cover the cost of living, particularly housing. Worse they have to juggle their schedule because they are working 3 jobs since they only get 20 hours per job so that their employer can avoid paying benefits.

Throw in the fact that in BC we have the highest cost of living in Canada and the lowest minimum wage and you begin to get an impenetrable barrier.

Close to 80% of my income this time around goes for housing. The other 20% disappears before my other expenses are covered forcing me to decide which items I can afford and what items I must do about.

I need a car to get to work but insurance and gas take the lions share of that 20%, but without getting to work and getting paid I cannot cover my housing costs which would put me on the street homeless (been there, had that happen) leading to a torturous, years long journey just to get back to my current position.

Currently my car needs work but there is no money (OK I have 9 cents to my name) for parts or repairs. Leaving me hoping, praying the car continues to run long enough for me to scrounge up enough money to keep it running.

Hunting for a better job? I cannot afford ink for my printer to send out resumes and/or cover letters.

I could go on citing the differences in my experience between starting out the first time and starting over/out this time but I will spare the reader so as not to lose them. Suffice it to say that I have found a vast difference between several decades ago and today.

Luck and who you know is today a better predictor of ones getting one’s life in order than hard work. It does not matter who is responsible for this state of affairs; something is wrong when hard work and effort will often do no more than keep your head barely above water.

As to poverty and crime be glad that poverty is not the root of crime since with my background and experience it is integrity and honour that stands between me and wealth. Every time I hear of people losing their savings, several perfectly legal methods of transferring wealth to myself pop into my mind and I have to remind myself that it is not all about “what I have.”

I do not begrudge people their success. I do however object to those who use the power and influence that comes with success to deny others an opportunity for success.

Having the government change the rules to give employers advantages that permit union busting and the lowering of wages; or allowing employers to limit all employees to only 20 hours a week to avoid paying benefits thus complicating peoples lives because they have to work several jobs to get 40 hours (or however many hours are needed) work and reducing their quality of life; having government raise, year after year, tuition fees to pay for tax cuts rather than keep them at an affordable level; ….

One of the few areas of our society and economy that rewards on ability and hard work is the illegal drug business. It is this open opportunity that has created a vast pool of workers to draw upon to replace people lost to the natural attrition inherent in the illegal drug business. One of the reasons that hard work pays off is that the business operates outside government regulation. As a result of this there are no rules or barriers to protect the successful from those looking to advance.

We are forcing our children to assume large debt loads to obtain an education at the same time we are loading our children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren, great- great-grandchildren with government debt to finance our “successful” life styles.

Success or continued success that comes at the cost of others wellbeing and quality of life is unacceptable.

During our recent unprecedented worldwide economic boom homelessness, poverty and the numbers of poor rose.

Far too often these days one can make the effort to change who and what you are, work hard and still be unable to achieve much more than survival. A reality attested to by the recent survey conducted by the payroll company which found over 70% of Canadians wage earners are only one paycheque away from financial disaster.

Suggesting that more and more today the fault is not in ourselves but in our stars – or more accurately our society and government.

What do I want? I want to have the same opportunity to get ahead through ability and hard work that I had the first time I set out in search of Success.

********************************

COLUMN: Don’t begrudge success, because it’s in us all

Mark Rushton

My buddy, with a smile on his face, asked “Where’s the fancy truck” when I rolled up beside him in my nine-year old pickup.

“You’re lookin’ at it,” I replied, “and right now I probably couldn’t get enough for it to buy a decent bicycle and replace the eight-foot row boat that somebody swiped.”

In other words, my friend reads the letters to the editor.

And I couldn’t help pointing out to him that if I had said poor people were to blame for all the crime and theft, I’d have been pilloried.

That’s the problem with assumptions … whether it be criminals or my possessions … because to assume is to make an ass(of)U(or)me. And it’s not me, because while I may not be the brightest light on the Christmas tree, I have been polishing the bulb for a lot of years. And I try to choose words carefully so sometimes what’s between the lines is more important than what’s in them.

So I don’t, and will never, believe that poverty is the root of crime.

Yes, poverty can be one of the causes, but so is greed. In fact, the majority of crime is instigated by money, large sums of it, and the people perpetrating it are anything but poor or uneducated.

However, I don’t take issue with poverty, and in fact, think it awful there are people who truly have to scrabble hand to mouth.

But at the same time, don’t preach to me that people’s success is the cause of flaws in our society.

Hard as it may be for some to accept, it is the successful in society who pay for the social safety net that provides for those who need it the most.

Ask anyone who makes a good income to tell you how much tax they pay – tax that provides hospitals, schools, social assistance, etc.

There is no shame in being successful. And there is no restriction in our society to anyone who truly wants to be successful.

Some fritter away their day watching TV, or incessantly beating out inanities on Twitter; others become preoccupied with bemoaning their lot in life and never attempt to rise above it.

For others, I readily admit, there are difficulties in breaking out of poverty. But for every one of them, there is a story of someone who rose from rags to riches.

And each and every one of those who have made life a success will rage at the thought that their efforts, their drive and their success are the cause of the flaws of our society, or that they should feel guilt, because for every dollar they take in, another goes out to benefit those in need.

That’s how society works in a democracy, which flawed though it may be, has fewer people on the poverty line than in those countries which are not.

Am I ashamed of what I have? An unadulterated NO! Should others who through skill, good fortune, education, or yes, even family assistance, be ashamed of what they have accomplished or what they have? Again ‘no’! And to be honest, we’d all like more!

Poverty is both a state of being, and a state of mind – neither of which is good.

But being poor does not make one a criminal, nor does it take away one’s dignity.

What is important is pride of self, and if one applies that pride, one is truly never poor. And if someone is willing to work as hard, or harder, as they think they possibly can, poverty can become a thing of the past.

Will everyone climb out of it? No.

But those who have, those who may never have faced it, and those who are successful are not the cause of the flaws in our society.

The cause is within each and every one of us who doesn’t make the effort to change who and what we are.

An Abbotsford Fable

Once upon a time there was a poor troll who lived under a village bridge. The sheriff’s men and village workers were going to move the troll along “for his own good” but being wonderful human beings they were concerned about the poor troll and took along some people to reach out and find the troll a more acceptable place to live. And the troll lived happily ever after in a castle on the mountain.

The preceding tale bears as much correlation to reality as the fairy tale in the September 11th Abbotsford News. As do any of the previous same spin, different bridge tales.

It would appear that whoever is responsible for this ongoing PR campaign featuring this series of same story, different bridge “news” (and I use the term news very loosely) articles are operating under the assumption that Lenin was correct and “A lie told often enough becomes the truth.”

No matter how often the local papers repeat this everything is wonderful mantra, that a homeless person “was put in contact with resources, and will have a more acceptable place to live”, it will not cause the suitable housing or the supportive services to help the homeless stay housed and get their lives back together to appear. In real life, no fairy godmothers will appear with their magic wands.

Unfortunately there is also a complete lack of leadership and willpower to take the actions necessary to do more than recycle the homeless through the system.

Depressingly, the knowledge and best practices exist to reduce homelessness and bring about recovery and wellness for those dealing with mental illness and/or addiction. But until we have the will to subvert the dominant paradigm (put an end to the status quo) and drive change forward homelessness, mental illness and addiction will continue to be a bane of our communities and society.

It won’t be easy, it will take effort and require change but it can be done. We start by hanging a question mark on the things we know or have long taken for granted.

What happened to the prior gentleman who, for his own wellbeing, was removed from under the Peardonville overpass and put into contact with resources? Not as easy as a photo op and recycling an old story, but much more informative.

Action and reaction, ebb and flow, trial and error, change – this is the rhythm of living. Change: clearer vision, fresh hope – and out of hope, progress.

*****************************************

Abbotsford Police officers crawled into the debris-strewn crawl space under the bridge deck of the Clearbrook overpass on Thursday morning.

Gravel trucks on Highway 1 thundered past just feet below, blasting dust up and onto the narrow ledge packed tight with the carcasses of wrecked bikes, bags of garbage and broken bottles.

Officers were there to help the city workers clean up the site and try to convince the man who called the bunker his home to seek alternative shelter.

Two Salvation Army workers were also on scene to liaise with the man.

Const. Ian MacDonald said such camps are safety hazards that have resulted in tragedy before.

In February a homeless man perished in a fire underneath the Peardonville highway overpass after heating his shelter with open fuel sources.

The city, police, and outreach workers try to make contact with people living in homeless camps and find them more suitable housing prior to cleaning them up, said MacDonald.

“My understanding is we encountered one individual [Thursday] morning and he was put into contact with resources, and will have a more acceptable place to live.”

Politicians Lie? What a Shock!

I'm Shocked!
I'm Shocked!

Why is anyone surprised that politicians would lie, withhold information or release information when it is most favourable to the politicians?

After all that is how the voting public has trained them to behave.

When you punish those of integrity – who tell the truth, want to address important issues, are solution oriented acknowledging that solutions are not going to be neat, tidy or free, are interested in the wellbeing of all Canadians and in bringing change; then have the audacity to insist on talking about these things when Canadians want to hear everything is wonderful and it is easy, simple and inexpensive to fix problems – by refusing to listen or think about what they are saying and refusing to vote for those of integrity because they insist on telling the voting public the truth, is it any wonder that people of integrity cease seeking office?

When you reward those who tell the public what it wants to hear no matter what the reality of the situation is; listen to their fear-mongering tales of boogeyman; accept unquestioningly financial statements and claims that if applied to your personal finances would have you homeless and on the street; accept unquestioningly statements that cannot stand up to event the most elementary logic or reason; insist that problems have easy, neat, tidy and fast answers; claim that everything is wonderful and there is not need for change; pit citizen against citizen for personal and political advantage – voting for them simply because they tell the voting public what it wants to hear, is it any wonder that politicians lie, withhold information or release it when it is to their advantage?

“What is the primary purpose of a political leader? To build a majority. If voters care about parking lots, then talk about parking lots.” Newt Gingrich

When the public votes only for those who tell them what they want to hear and about parking lots, refusing to listen to, consider or vote for those who insist on addressing issues, how can they be surprised that they end up without people of integrity in government and with a legislature populated with those who will lie and tell them whatever they want to hear in order to win?

If citizens want people of integrity in government then they have to convince people of integrity that they are ready to listen, to think about and to engage in discussion of important issues – even if they would rather not hear about issues, about making choices and change.

Then they have to be willing to vote for them.

There is a joke that goes: Stop repeat offenders. Don’t re-elect them.

If citizens want honour and integrity in those in elected office they have to vote for people of honour and integrity.

Understand that if you elect people of honour and integrity they are not going to lie to you and tell you what you want to hear, they are going to tell you what is and what you need to hear about, think about and decide about.

Healthcare

Watching Adrian Dix (Health Critic), Carole James and the NDP performance on the issue of Healthcare is a clear illustration of why, despite the overwhelming baggage carried by Gordon Campbell and the Liberals, the NDP were rejected in the last election; managing to lose an election that was theirs to lose.

In scrambling to remain leader of the NDP Carole James has abandoned issue based policy that focuses on the needs of the province, its citizens and solutions, to pursue a course that is based on: Can we score political points here? Will this bump up NDP popularity and push down Liberal popularity? Will this serve my desperate need to remain leader of the NDP?

Healthcare is a serious issue with no easy answers and a leader, as opposed to a politician, would be focused on finding workable solutions to the issue – not scoring political points.

Watching Adrian Dix’s performance night after night one is left to conclude that the NDP either do not understand the realities and implications of this problem or else have no clue as to how to go about addressing this looming crisis, other than desperately throwing money at it – causing a domino effect and triggering crises across all provincial programs and their budgets.

Gordon Campbell and the Liberals deserve to be taken to task (have their asses solidly kicked – repeatedly until they act responsibly) over their response to the growing problems in healthcare. Indeed the appointment of Kevin Falcon as Minister of Health suggests Campbell and the Liberals are going to stay the course and simply manage how fast the healthcare system moves from growing problems into crisis. Campbell and his Liberals have shown no ideas, leadership or intention of acting to avoid a healthcare crisis with its serious repercussions for citizen’s access to healthcare and citizens pocketbooks.

No doubt the need for funds to feed healthcare’s voracious appetite for funds helped persuade the Liberals to agree to the HST and the billion plus dollars this agreement will put in BC’s treasury.

Faced with serious challenges to our healthcare system, faced with the serious repercussions such a crisis would have on all aspects of government and government programs neither party leader nor their party caucuses or the parties themselves demonstrate an interest or ability to find workable solutions that will reform the current healthcare system from it’s current Rube Goldberg machine status to an efficient deliverer of services. The healthcare system in BC has become a complex, convoluted bureaucracy whose hallmark is inefficiency.

Aside: Rube Goldberg is best known for a series of popular cartoons he created depicting complex devices that perform simple tasks in indirect, convoluted ways. Indeed Goldberg is the inspiration for various international competitions, known as Rube Goldberg contests, which challenge participants to make a complex machine to perform a simple task. Government has turned the healthcare system into such a needlessly indirect, convoluted system.

The “we want healthcare, we want it now, we want it for free and we do not want to be bothered to have to think, make choices or make decisions’ current attitude of citizens has led to the current (escalating) problems that threaten to topple the unsustainable house of cards we have built or allowed to be built by government to deliver healthcare.

Citizens have to become engaged in making decisions, seeking solutions and making choices, even if hard, or risk having our currently unsustainable healthcare system collapse.

An examination of past and current budgets shows unsustainable increases in healthcare costs. If the trend continues it will not be long, even with the Liberals delaying tactics, before healthcare will need 100% of the provincial budget.

Remember that the Liberal government increased the healthcare budget by $500,000,000.00 and that this huge increase was still not sufficient to feed the voracious appetite for the increasing large sums money that the healthcare delivery system has developed.

$500,000,000.00 and the system demand hundreds of millions more dollars. What would the demands of the health care system been if the Liberal government had not imposed the $500,000,000.00 cap on increased funding?
A $1,000,000,000.00? More that a billion dollars?

The Carole James/Adrian Dix/NDP plan of throwing money at healthcare simply moves the day of reckoning for healthcare up a few years as opposed to when the day of reckoning will come under the Liberals.

With a healthcare system needing yearly increases in the neighbourhood of $1,000,000,000.00, any BC provincial government faces some combination of reducing monies to other programs and tax increases to feed the insatiable appetite healthcare has developed for funding. Even with cuts and tax increases healthcare will reach 100% of the budget in at most a decade.

Just to hold the funding for all programs other than healthcare at this years levels the province would have to raise taxes every year by the amount of the increase needed to fund healthcare. Freezing programs at current levels is the same as cutting funding to these programs every year their funding remains frozen.

Under the course of action being followed or proposed by either the Liberals or NDP the province will, in a few short years, reach the point where 100% of the budget will be spent on healthcare and all other programs will get $0 funding.

Examination of the financial and operating realities of BC’s budget and healthcare system leads to a troublesome conclusion:

Indisputably, the way we currently deliver healthcare in BC is unsustainable.

While denial may seem a more comfortable way to deal with this reality, it makes no sense to continue to ignore the ever growing monster healthcare has become until healthcare/other programs/the budget/the province collapse under the appetite for funding that healthcare currently has.

The intelligent, the rational approach, indeed the only way to avoid losing healthcare, is to address healthcare’s many issues; continuing to pretending everything is and will be fine is a path that will lead only to disaster.

A disaster it is possible to avoid if we choose to act now.

Look around; there are many healthcare systems around the world that manage to deliver healthcare effectively without wiping out all other programs or bankrupting governments and citizens.

To achieve delivery of healthcare to the citizens of BC effectively and affordably BC’s healthcare system is going to require restructuring, drastic restructuring. To accomplish this will require ‘thinking outside the box’, something politicians are loathe to do because of the risks involved.

Politicians love being able to exert control and eliminate surprises. How do you exert control and eliminate surprises in a healthcare system? You build a many layered bureaucracy as BC has done with regionalization.

Bureaucracies are about exerting control and eliminating surprises. Since these are major wants of our current politicians it is not surprising that government become a series of isolated, convoluted bureaucracies that compete, not cooperate, among the differing Ministries.

Unfortunately, while politicians and bureaucrats love bureaucracies, a bureaucracy by its very nature is inefficient, and to varying degrees ineffective.
The more complexity involved in the system to be controlled the more bureaucracy that is required to exert that control.

Bureaucracies, because of their goals of control and no surprises, resist/oppose change and innovation.

Newtonian physics tells us that inertia acts to keep an object at rest at rest. It further states that the more mass (the larger) an object has the more inertia the object has.

Consider the complexity of the task of delivering healthcare to the citizens of BC. As a result of that complexity, exerting control and preventing surprises requires a large bureaucracy that most closely resembles a labyrinth. This results in a healthcare system whose inertia is such that the system is in effect an immovable object when it comes to changes.

This large labyrinth of a bureaucracy not only resists and/or defeats the change and innovation necessary for the healthcare system to avoid ongoing rounds of service cuts and increased waiting times; it devours far to large of a portion of the healthcare budget and inflicts wasteful costs on the portion of the healthcare system that delivers actual hands-on healthcare. Thus much of the healthcare budget is spent on bureaucracy and bureaucrats rather than delivery of actual, hands-on healthcare.

This same money devouring bureaucracy prevents the innovation and change that must take place in order to avoid continuing rounds of cuts to healthcare services year after year or a budget crisis triggered by healthcare’s need for an ever increasing percentage of the BC budget – either of which will result in a healthcare crisis in BC.

The time has come where, in order to avoid a medical crisis for the system and the patients it is charged with providing healthcare to, healthcare in BC requires acute care.

What course do we need to pursue in order to save the healthcare system?

Keep in mind that the healthcare system comprises two components – the component charged with controlling the healthcare system and the component that is involved with the actual delivery of healthcare to citizens (i.e. your local hospital, clinic or doctor).

We have to deal with the bureaucracy that has grown so weighty it is crushing those components of the system that deliver the healthcare services.

How do we reform the bureaucracy?

Remember we are speaking of a large, complex bureaucracy that has evolved into a perplexing labyrinth with inertia such that the bureaucracy resists change, any change.

Part of Fraser Health recently was putting the finishing touches on a new ten year strategic plan since it had been 10 years since the last strategic plan was prepared.

And what happened with the earlier strategic plan? Nothing. Why? Because there was no funding to implement it.

What is the significance? Strategic planning is an organization’s process of defining its strategy, or direction, and making decisions on allocating its resources to pursue this strategy. In other words it is a plan of what you are going to do and how you are going to do it.

Even in a half-assed managed system there is no need of special funding to implement the strategic plan. This is what you are going to do, this is how you are going to do it and you do it. The healthcare bureaucracy is so set on course, so resistant to change that even if it has a change it wants to make – it cannot make it unless a new portion is added to the bureaucracy to try to change behaviour.

In instances where funding was budgeted to make changes, those changes literally take years just to begin to implement. Since all the changes, including ones set in motion more than a decade ago, I am aware of are still, at least to some degree, in process I cannot judge whether they will ever be fully implemented.

Based on my business and management experience I doubt that any plan, no matter how brilliant, would be able to change the current healthcare bureaucracy into the lean, efficient, effective and adaptable management system needed.

Moreover, the government is risk adverse and a control freak and so will support the status quo until crisis forces changes – or citizens do.

Does this mean healthcare is doomed?

That depends entirely on the citizens of BC. If they continue to want and look for simple, easy and neat solutions; if they continue to prefer the platitudes and promises of the Liberals or the nonsensical braying of the NDP; we are going to have a healthcare crisis. A crisis that will trigger a budget crisis and crises in all provincial programs as the funding demands of healthcare drain money from all other programs.

If citizens recognize that we face a looming healthcare crisis, that we need to act to avoid this crisis, that the outcomes of actions that need to be taken are not going to be simple, easy and neat, can reach a consensus on the form change needs to take and demand/force the politicians to act we will need to slog our way through but can avoid the collapse of healthcare.

Caveat: There is another path to avoiding a crisis that needs to be put on the table. Taxes could be raised. Taxes would need to be raised by the amount needed to cover the increased funding needed by the healthcare system – at a minimum.

Should citizens not want to face large yearly tax increases to fund healthcare they need to get involved in the discussion of what course of action to follow, in coming up with ideas (the best way to have a good idea is to have lots of ideas. Linus Pauling) of what changes to make and how, and be involved where possible (hospital boards) in the new healthcare management system.

Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex.
It takes a touch of genius — and a lot of courage — to move in the opposite direction. E. F. Schumacher

If we need to reduce the bureaucratic component but cannot reform the bureaucracy what needs to be done?

Surgery, the cancerous growth must be excised to save the patient, healthcare.

We want to achieve a management system that functions in the manner of a matrix system where there is one layer of management above those facets of the healthcare system that deliver, hands-on healthcare to people – and only one layer. Decision making needs to be pushed as close to the front lines as possible. Management needs to have citizens involved in the system for their input and so that citizens can understand challenges facing the healthcare system and help form the judgement of the best decision to make.

We need to encourage experimentation with best practices from other healthcare systems. If it is decided in different segments of the system to try different best practices – management should accommodate this and facilitate the evaluation and comparison or the results. If they both work then those who will have to implement and work with the best practice need to be allowed to choose the practice they feel would work best in their situation.

Bottom up decision making of what is needed and how things should run.

Flexible, adaptable, embracing of change – a team focused on accomplishing what needs to be done.

Healthcare in BC needs the type of management system the politicians will abhor because, in focusing on the needs of patients and the effective and efficient delivery of services to meet those needs, top down control, lack of change, an absence of ‘situations’ will not be a goal or likely outcome of such a system.

I concede that putting this change in place and managing the situation will not be neat and easy. It will not be as simple in implementation as it is in concept. It will be challenging and interesting.
Consider:

There is no way to play it safe given the current and future circumstances governing healthcare and the budget.

Necessity of action takes away the fear of the act, and makes bold resolution the favourite of fortune. Francis Quarles

Given the importance of healthcare, the complexity of the situation and short (a few years) timeframe we need to act boldly.

In difficult and desperate cases, the boldest counsels are the safest. Titus Livius

Given the need for bold action in cutting away the current bureaucracy, it will not be possible to anticipate and put in place all the people and systems. The people and the system will need to evolve to become the effective and efficient system required.

Sometimes you have to take the leap, and build your wings on the way down. Kobi Yamada

We’ve got serious problems, and we need serious people not our current crop of politicians whose interest is in managing the problems so that they get re-elected, not in solving our problems or providing true leadership.

Preying on the Poor and Homeless

Reprehensible, despicable, abominable, anathema?

Anathema, best begins to reflect the contempt I hold those who prey upon the poor in; a behaviour that is unfortunately neither unusual nor that rare in Abbotsford.

I spent time on July 31 paying rent and other bills which left me broke but secure for another month. I could do this because the monies due me were in fact deposited in my bank account.

I spent time on August 1 explaining to a gentleman what the rules were and what he needed to do to get a bed in the shelter that evening. He found himself in need of a bed at the emergency shelter because monies due him had not been paid. Sadly he was not the only person finding themselves in a bad situation because this “employer” had not paid people the wages they were due.

One of the other people who were on this job had been at the shelter when this “employment opportunity” came his way. Had been at the shelter because, with the long hours they were working, he had not returned to the shelter in order not to lose this “job” and the opportunity it represented to earn enough money to be able to afford an apartment and to start to get his feet back under him.

In doing the demolition on what had been the Grand Theatre in the Clearbrook Town Square Mall on South Fraser Way in Abbotsford they had been labouring hard 14+ hours a day to be done by the deadline.

These were not the only two victims who had the rug pulled out from under them once the job was finished. The friend I was sitting beside on August 1 had been telling me about others who had also been left owed a thousand plus dollars of wages for this job. After the gentleman had left my friend gave me a ‘what are you going to do about this’ look – a look he is very good at.

The people hired to do the hard labour during the demolition were homeless or poor in need of the money for rent so as not to join the growing ranks of homeless on Abbotsford’s streets or to get off the streets into housing.

They are each owed $1,000+ apiece and have been told there is no money to pay them what is owed, that they may get 25% of what they earned. Often in these circumstances they get nothing. Or only get the small “advances” given by the “kind, understanding” boss to keep them coming back and working hard.

To quote Samuel Butler: Man is the only animal that can remain on friendly terms with the victims he intends to eat until he eats them.
This kind of behaviour is why temporary labour agencies have long lines of workers at their doors – better to get minimum wage and actually be paid than to “earn” double the minimum wage but never see a cent.

The poor and homeless are seen as powerless victims who, lacking power, are helpless to do anything about collecting the monies owed them. Prey to be exploited to line someone’s pockets.

In this instance, even if they thought about filing a lien, could they fill out the paperwork and then file their class action suit in small claims court?

Except … for a certain ‘what are you going to do about this’ look. I told my friend to pass along the fact that we can, should, will file a lien to get their money. That I can and will help them fill out the paperwork and file their lien to get the monies they earned through hard work if necessary.

If city council feels the need to pull business licenses or deny the ability to do business in Abbotsford they should apply this principle to those who prey on the poor and powerless, not just to those who annoy the powerful. They should be telling those who seek wealth by preying on the poor that this is not an acceptable business practice in Abbotsford.