Consider

Which wolf do you choose to feed …

Leave a comment

A friend sent me this and somehow it just seemed so appropriate after I had just read that a new national study, titled HungerCount 2007, says 720,231 people, a number just shy of the population of New Brunswick, were forced to turn to one of the country’s 673 food banks in March to feed themselves or their families.

A holy man was having a conversation with the Lord one day and said, ‘Lord, I would like to know what Heaven and Hell are like.’

The Lord led the holy man to two doors. He opened one of the doors and the holy man looked in.

In the middle of the room was a large round table. In the middle of the table was a large pot of stew, which smelled delicious and made the holy man’s mouth water. The people sitting around the table were thin and sickly. They appeared to be famished.

They were holding spoons with very long handles that were strapped to their arms and each found it possible to reach into the pot of stew and take a spoonful. But because the handle was longer than their arms, they could not get the spoons back into their mouths.

The holy man shuddered at the sight of their misery and suffering. The Lord said, ‘You have seen Hell.’

They went to the next room and opened the door. It was exactly the same as the first one. There was the large round table with the large pot of stew which made the holy man’s mouth water. The people were equipped with the same long-handled spoons, but here the people were well nourished and plump, laughing and talking.

The holy man said, ‘I don’t understand.’ It is simple,’ said the Lord. ‘It requires but one skill. You see they have learned to feed each other, while the greedy think only of themselves.’

We live in one of the richest countries of the world. On Canada’s table is a large pot of wealth and food. There is no material reason that so many are famished and thin, or living homeless and sick.

Another word for pot is crucible, but crucible also means: a severe test, as of patience or belief; a trial. Canada is the crucible; the hungry, the homeless and other neighbours in need our severe test, our trial. Is you soul well nurished and plump from having learned to feed others or is it thin and sickly because you think only of yourself?

Poverty

Economic boom not putting food banks on the shelf

Leave a comment

Economic boom not putting food banks on the shelf

Norma Greenaway, CanWest News Service
Published: Thursday, November 08, 2007

OTTAWA – Canada is on a roll. The jobless rate is near record lows, oil prices are soaring, the loonie is flying high, and the federal government is awash in surplus cash. The good economic news has not, however, erased the country’s hunger problem.

A new national study, titled HungerCount 2007, says 720,231 people, a number just shy of the population of New Brunswick, were forced to turn to one of the country’s 673 food banks in March to feed themselves or their families.

The tally was down slightly from last year. But it was up almost nine per cent from a decade ago, and no province or territory can boast that food banks have outlived their usefulness, says the Canadian Association of Food Banks, which has conducted the annual survey since 1989. The survey, released_Thursday, covers only one month

Although there have been fluctuations from year to year, the number of users has remained “unacceptably high” at more than 700,000 for each of the past 11 years, the survey found. Moreover, people with jobs comprise the second-largest group of food bank users, after those on social assistance.

“This is a sad reality when we live in such a prosperous country,” Katharine Schmidt, the association’s executive director, told a news conference on Parliament Hill.

Schmidt said the $60 billion in tax cuts announced last week by the federal government, including a one-point cut in the GST and a dip in the tax rate on the lowest-income earners, must be followed up with, among other things, more generous federal tax benefits for working people and parents, and an expansion of the Employment Insurance program to cover more people and to give them better benefits.

Even in booming Alberta, food banks reported a steady stream of clients again this year, many of whom reported having jobs. Camrose and District Food Bank reported, for example, that 90 per cent of its clients received most of their income from employment.

Food banks helped 38,837 Albertans in March, or 1.1 per cent of the provincial population, the report said. Of the clientele, 43 per cent were children, 27 per cent reported earning wages and 35 per cent said they were on social assistance.

In the nation’s capital, the Ottawa food bank said the number of schools seeking meals for hungry children has grown dramatically to 17. The food bank has also started providing 12,000 meals to children during the summer months.

Nationally, the survey said children accounted for almost four of 10 people using food banks. Single-parent families account for 28 per cent of the clientele, two-parent families 22 per cent, single people 37 per cent, and couples without children 12 per cent.

People on social assistance were the primary users of food banks at 51 per cent. Employed people accounted for 13.5 per cent, people on disability supports accounted for 12.5 per cent, pensioners accounted for six per cent, and people on Employment Insurance benefits accounted for five per cent.

For the first time, the association surveyed the housing situations of people using food banks and found that 86 per cent were renters and eight per cent were homeowners.

Peter Tilley, executive director of the Ottawa Food Bank, said the annual studies illustrate a sad reality that food banks, once thought of as emergency assistance for people needing some short-term help, have become a crucial part of the country’s social safety net for hundreds of thousands of people.

“It’s a shame we made a business out of poverty,” he said with a grim smile, referring to the network of food banks across the country, most of which, he stressed, rely almost exclusively on volunteer labour.

Consider, Municipal

Statistic – meaningful or empty of meaning?

Leave a comment

One of our city councilors sent an email asking the source of the statement that Abbotsford has the highest per capital median income. The coucilor cited a chart: Median total income, by family type, by census metropolitan area (All census families) showing Abbotsford ranking well below number one. I asked if going with a family chart when the donations were on an individual basis was proper.

I also acknowledged that due to my current homelessness I do not have access to my computer and the files on it, further my written files and notes are in storage with the computer. All I have is a workbook full of interesting data points. I do know that the data I was working with originally was in a much more “raw” or detailed format/state, but lacking access to my files I cannot quantify matters at this time.

Recognize that the experience of being homeless is one of the reasons I have serious questions about the generousity in this City. It is also why actions, not words or wasting time in self congratulations, is a priority from my point of view

Checking later I found the councilor had sent an email with a chart of individual median incomes. In reviewing the data in the chart sent to me by the councilor I was struck by all the qualifiers and quantifiers applied to arrive at the data in the form it was presented in the chart. In thinking about this list and its qualifiers and quantifiers I decide my pool ponderings had a large degree of truth to them.

I had gone to the pool after the original exchange of emails. The way my mind works it was unable not to ponder the questions raised by the councilor and the concepts of donations, median, individual income etc (and don’t you wish our politicians and leaders also could not avoid spending time thinking about questions raised and related questions/ideas?). For instance median means middle. You stack all the donations up and the one that is in the middle is the median. Many people confuse average with median. Which had me asking why are they using median instead of average? I spent all 2000 meters, showering and dressing contemplating the question of the meaning of the median donation and what it signified.

What does the median imcome of a population have to do with the median donations? The median donation is decided only using the donations themselves. Does it not follow that in determining a median income level we should only be considering the median incomes of those who gave donations? What about the question of how many donors were included in determing the median donation? There are very different implications if median of one is composed of 5 donors and the other of 5,000 donors. Can you compare Abbotsford with a 2006 census population of 123, 864 to Toronto with a 2006 census population of 2,503,281?

So at 1:30 AM as I mull over all these and the other thoughts/questions I am left wondering about what if anything this idea of median donations tells us or if it has any meaning at all. I can think of many other measures I would want to know in determining the most generous city in Canada. I am left with the conclusion that median donation is pretty much a null value point, meaningless other than giving the city of Abbotsford bragging rights and city politicians another excuse to hide behind in regards to taking no action on social issues such as poverty, homelessness and affordable housing.

What a statistic really means, or if it really has any meaning at all needs careful thought. It is why I recommend “How to Lie with Statistics”, Darrell Huff’s perennially best-selling introduction to statistics for the general reader.

I wiah to underscore my original assertion that this median donation number does not reflect the reality on the streets of Abbotsford where more families, children and seniors depend on charitable organizations and people for food, clothing and other necessities, where the streets become home to increasing numbers of homeless daily and adults, children and seniors go to sleep each night hungry.

If in fact Abbotsford is the most generous city in the country where do all the dollars go? Because being homeless and looking around Abbotsford it is clear the dollars are not going to help neighbours in need of help and other worthy causes.

Hmmm

Free the Heart of Valor – NOW

Leave a comment
I am sure I am not the only fan of Canadian science fiction author Tanya Huff who wants to know why the regional library staff is holding her new novel “Heart of Valor” hostage.

This novel has been listed in the library catalogue as “in processing” for more than a month at this point. Which has brought me to the point of writing to the Times in hopes they will be able to determine what ransom is required to bring about the release of “Heart of Valor” from vile duress at the hands of heinous regional staff.

Not only is this incarceration unacceptable, I am sure that this denial of access impinges on our Charter rights. Freedom of Speech is a keystone value in the management of a library and this behaviour raises questions about regional staff’s understanding of this value.

Free the Heart of Valor – NOW.

Municipal

Should not a Greenway be green?

Leave a comment

Ok I admit it fits within the dictionary definition of “any scenic trail or route” but I still do not see how you can call an asphalt path a greenway even if you cleverly label the asphalt as “all-weather surface”.

Should not a greenway be somewhere you can get away from the asphalt jungle of the city to at least the illusion of nature?

I came across a big colourful poster singing the city’s praises last night for the new greenway and found myself wondering if a greenway should not involve more green and natural surface than asphalt?

I am reasonably sure that the purpose of the provincial grant was to make the greenway as green and nature friendly as possible. Not for the city to slap down some asphalt to do it as cheaply as possible so that leftover monies could go to feed City Hall’s voracious appetite for taxpayer dollars to waste on such things as nice big colourful posters telling citizens how wonderful the city’s actions are.

Or the next thing you know we will have a massive advertising campaign selling us the wonders of City Hall’s really big greenway – South Fraser Way.